Bailey v. Smokowicz
This text of 515 F. App'x 200 (Bailey v. Smokowicz) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
Affirmed by unpublished PER CURIAM opinion.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
Christopher C. Bailey, IV, appeals the district court’s order denying his motion for default judgment and granting defendants’ motion to dismiss his 42 U.S.C. § 1983 (2006) complaint. See Fed.R.Civ.P. 12(b)(2), (5), (6). We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, although we grant leave to proceed in forma pauperis, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. Bailey v. Smokowicz, No. 4:12-cv-00042-RBS-DEM (E.D. Va. filed Sept. 13, 2012; entered Sept. 14, 2012). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before this court and argument would not aid the decisional process.
AFFIRMED.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
515 F. App'x 200, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/bailey-v-smokowicz-ca4-2013.