Bailey v. Siracusa
This text of Bailey v. Siracusa (Bailey v. Siracusa) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Hawaii Supreme Court primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
Electronically Filed Supreme Court SCWC-12-0001006 17-JUL-2014 07:52 AM
SCWC-12-0001006
IN THE SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF HAWAI#I
ALYSSA M. BAILEY, Petitioner/Plaintiff-Appellant,
vs.
JOHN ANTHONY SIRACUSA and SANDRA G. SIRACUSA, dba METRO MOTORS, Respondents-Defendants-Appellees.
CERTIORARI TO THE INTERMEDIATE COURT OF APPEALS (CAAP-12-0001006; CIV. NO. 11-1-0278)
ORDER REJECTING APPLICATION FOR WRIT OF CERTIORARI (By: Recktenwald, C.J., Nakayama, McKenna, Pollack, and Wilson, JJ.)
Petitioner/Plaintiff-Appellant’s Application for Writ
of Certiorari, filed on June 3, 2014, is hereby rejected.
DATED: Honolulu, Hawai#i, July 17, 2014.
Charles S. Lotsof /s/ Mark E. Recktenwald for petitioner /s/ Paula A. Nakayama Philip R. Brown, Effie Steiger and /s/ Sabrina S. McKenna Justin M. Chu for respondents /s/ Richard W. Pollack
/s/ Michael D. Wilson
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
Bailey v. Siracusa, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/bailey-v-siracusa-haw-2014.