Bailey v. Simpson

57 Ga. 523
CourtSupreme Court of Georgia
DecidedJuly 15, 1876
StatusPublished
Cited by1 cases

This text of 57 Ga. 523 (Bailey v. Simpson) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of Georgia primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Bailey v. Simpson, 57 Ga. 523 (Ga. 1876).

Opinion

Bleckley, Judge.

Grant that the deed by husband to wife passed title, the title returned to the husband when the wife died, as the law of inheritance formerly stood. It does not appear that the wife died after the law was changed, and the j? urden of making this appear was on the complainant. Moreover, if the complainant had title, it could have been asserted by the interposition of a claim — there was no need for injunction. The allegation that, without injunction, the complainant’s injury would be irremediable, is of no value, for a state of facts is not presented from which such injury is likely to accrue. For aught that appears, all apprehended injury might be prevented by interposing a claim in the usual statutory method.

Judgment affirmed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Imperial Hotel Company v. Martin
35 S.E.2d 502 (Supreme Court of Georgia, 1945)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
57 Ga. 523, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/bailey-v-simpson-ga-1876.