Bailey v. Schnitzius

53 N.J. Eq. 235

Supreme Court of New Jersey·Decided March 15, 1895·Published·Cited by 1 cases

Opinion

Per Curiam.

Order affirmed, for the reasons given in the court of chancery.

For affirmance — Dixon, G-ummere, Lippincott, Magie,. Reed, Van Syckel, Bogart, Brown, Krueger, Sims — 10..

For reversal — Hone.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Bailey v. Schnitzius, 53 N.J. Eq. 235 (N.J. 1895).

Pincite

53 N.J. Eq. 235 (Bailey v. Schnitzius) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.