Bailey v. Santay

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York

Bailey v. Santay

262 A.D. 1029, 30 N.Y.S.2d 365, 1941 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 7108

CourtAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

DecidedOctober 14, 1941

StatusPublished

Cited by2 cases

This text of 262 A.D. 1029 (Bailey v. Santay) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Bailey v. Santay, 262 A.D. 1029, 30 N.Y.S.2d 365, 1941 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 7108 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1941).

Pincite

Opinion

Order, on reargument, in so far as appealed from, denying the plaintiffs-appellants’ motion to set aside the verdict, unanimously affirmed, with costs. Before the verdict was rendered, appellants’ counsel was informed by the court of the action taken. By not objecting before the verdict was rendered, he waived plaintiffs’ right to object thereafter. Present — Lazansky, P. J., Hagarty, Carswell, Taylor and Close, JJ.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Order, on reargument, in so far as appealed from, denying the plaintiffs-appellants’ motion to set aside the verdict, unanimously affirmed, with costs. Before the verdict was rendered, appellants’ counsel was informed by the court of the action taken. By not objecting before the verdict was rendered, he waived plaintiffs’ right to object thereafter. Present — Lazansky, P. J., Hagarty, Carswell, Taylor and Close, JJ.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

262 A.D. 1029, 30 N.Y.S.2d 365, 1941 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 7108, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/bailey-v-santay-nyappdiv-1941.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack