Bailey v. Santay
262 A.D. 1029, 30 N.Y.S.2d 365, 1941 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 7108
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York·Decided October 14, 1941·Published·Cited by 2 cases
Opinion
Order, on reargument, in so far as appealed from, denying the plaintiffs-appellants’ motion to set aside the verdict, unanimously affirmed, with costs. Before the verdict was rendered, appellants’ counsel was informed by the court of the action taken. By not objecting before the verdict was rendered, he waived plaintiffs’ right to object thereafter. Present — Lazansky, P. J., Hagarty, Carswell, Taylor and Close, JJ.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Bailey v. Santay, 262 A.D. 1029, 30 N.Y.S.2d 365, 1941 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 7108 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1941).
262 A.D. 1029 (Bailey v. Santay) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.
Related
State v. Bolsinger
699 P.2d 1214 (Utah Supreme Court, 1985)