Bailey v. Russo

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York

Bailey v. Russo

248 A.D. 644

CourtAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

DecidedMay 15, 1936

StatusPublished

This text of 248 A.D. 644 (Bailey v. Russo) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Bailey v. Russo, 248 A.D. 644 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1936).

Pincite

Opinion

The plaintiff in her car going easterly on Market street in the city of Elmira was in collision with the defendant who had just come into Market street from Fox street to the south. The evidence presented an issue of fact as to which party was negligent. There were no legal errors that would require a reversal of the judgment in favor of the defendants. Judgment unanimously affirmed, with costs. Present — Hill, P. J., McNamee, Crapser, Bliss and Heffernan, JJ.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

The plaintiff in her car going easterly on Market street in the city of Elmira was in collision with the defendant who had just come into Market street from Fox street to the south. The evidence presented an issue of fact as to which party was negligent. There were no legal errors that would require a reversal of the judgment in favor of the defendants. Judgment unanimously affirmed, with costs. Present — Hill, P. J., McNamee, Crapser, Bliss and Heffernan, JJ.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

248 A.D. 644, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/bailey-v-russo-nyappdiv-1936.