Bailey v. Russo

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York

Bailey v. Russo

248 A.D. 644

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York·Decided May 15, 1936·Published

Opinion

The plaintiff in her car going easterly on Market street in the city of Elmira was in collision with the defendant who had just come into Market street from Fox street to the south. The evidence presented an issue of fact as to which party was negligent. There were no legal errors that would require a reversal of the judgment in favor of the defendants. Judgment unanimously affirmed, with costs. Present — Hill, P. J., McNamee, Crapser, Bliss and Heffernan, JJ.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

The plaintiff in her car going easterly on Market street in the city of Elmira was in collision with the defendant who had just come into Market street from Fox street to the south. The evidence presented an issue of fact as to which party was negligent. There were no legal errors that would require a reversal of the judgment in favor of the defendants. Judgment unanimously affirmed, with costs. Present — Hill, P. J., McNamee, Crapser, Bliss and Heffernan, JJ.

Bailey v. Russo, 248 A.D. 644 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1936).

Pincite

248 A.D. 644 (Bailey v. Russo) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.