Bailey v. Robinson Manufacturing Co.
270 A.D. 986, 62 N.Y.S.2d 667
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York·Decided June 14, 1946·Published·Cited by 3 cases
Opinion
We think the jury’s verdict in this ease was in great part contrary to the evidence and was clearly against the weight of the credible evidence, documentary and otherwise. The trial court was amply warranted in setting the verdict aside.
The order appealed from should be affirmed, with costs and disbursements to defendant.
Martin, P. J., Townley, Glennon, Dore and Cohn, JJ., concur.
Order unanimously affirmed, with costs and disbursements to the defendant.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Bailey v. Robinson Manufacturing Co., 270 A.D. 986, 62 N.Y.S.2d 667 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1946).
270 A.D. 986 (Bailey v. Robinson Manufacturing Co.) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.
Related
Peterson v. IBJ Schroder Bank & Trust Co.
172 A.D.2d 165 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 1991)
L. K. Comstock & Co. v. Duffy
43 A.D.2d 704 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 1973)
Brickman v. Niagara Fruit Co.
65 Misc. 2d 483 (New York Supreme Court, 1971)