Home/District Court of Appeal of Florida/Bailey v. Robinson

Bailey v. Robinson

344 So. 2d 930, 1977 Fla. App. LEXIS 22710
CourtDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida
DecidedApril 13, 1977
DocketNos. DD-341, DD-342
StatusPublished
Cited by1 cases

This text of 344 So. 2d 930 (Bailey v. Robinson) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering District Court of Appeal of Florida primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Bailey v. Robinson, 344 So. 2d 930, 1977 Fla. App. LEXIS 22710 (Fla. Ct. App. 1977).

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

Upon considering the briefs, the record and oral argument, we find no reversible error.

Accordingly, the orders appealed are affirmed and the case of E. Lamar Bailey and Ernest Bailey, d/b/a E. Lamar Bailey Associates v. Nathan Leo Linzy and Patricia J. Linzy is remanded to the trial court for a jury trial on the claim for damages made by Nathan Leo Linzy and Patricia J. Linzy against E. Lamar Bailey and Ernest Bailey, d/b/a E. Lamar Bailey Associates.

BOYER, C. J., and MILLS and McCORD, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Robinson v. Bailey
370 So. 2d 46 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 1979)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
344 So. 2d 930, 1977 Fla. App. LEXIS 22710, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/bailey-v-robinson-fladistctapp-1977.