Bailey v. Robinson
344 So. 2d 930, 1977 Fla. App. LEXIS 22710
District Court of Appeal of Florida·Decided April 13, 1977·No. Nos. DD-341, DD-342·Published·Cited by 1 cases
Opinion
Upon considering the briefs, the record and oral argument, we find no reversible error.
Accordingly, the orders appealed are affirmed and the case of E. Lamar Bailey and Ernest Bailey, d/b/a E. Lamar Bailey Associates v. Nathan Leo Linzy and Patricia J. Linzy is remanded to the trial court for a jury trial on the claim for damages made by Nathan Leo Linzy and Patricia J. Linzy against E. Lamar Bailey and Ernest Bailey, d/b/a E. Lamar Bailey Associates.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Bailey v. Robinson, 344 So. 2d 930, 1977 Fla. App. LEXIS 22710 (Fla. Ct. App. 1977).
344 So. 2d 930 (Bailey v. Robinson) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.
Related
Robinson v. Bailey
370 So. 2d 46 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 1979)