Bailey v. Ralph

4 Ark. 591
Supreme Court of Arkansas·Decided July 15, 1842·Published·Cited by 1 cases

Opinion

Held, that if, in replevin, there is judgment for the defendant, de retorno habendo, and an order for a writ of enquiry to assess damages, there is no final judgment from which an appeal lies to this court.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Bailey v. Ralph, 4 Ark. 591 (Ark. 1842).

4 Ark. 591 (Bailey v. Ralph) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Flanagan v. Drainage District No. 17
2 S.W.2d 70 (Supreme Court of Arkansas, 1928)