Bailey v. Ralph
4 Ark. 591
This text of 4 Ark. 591 (Bailey v. Ralph) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of Arkansas primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Bluebook
Bailey v. Ralph, 4 Ark. 591 (Ark. 1842).
Opinion
Held, that if, in replevin, there is judgment for the defendant, de retorno habendo, and an order for a writ of enquiry to assess damages, there is no final judgment from which an appeal lies to this court.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Flanagan v. Drainage District No. 17
2 S.W.2d 70 (Supreme Court of Arkansas, 1928)
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
Bluebook (online)
4 Ark. 591, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/bailey-v-ralph-ark-1842.