Bailey v. Oce Business Services Inc.
This text of Bailey v. Oce Business Services Inc. (Bailey v. Oce Business Services Inc.) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering District Court, District of Columbia primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA
NICOLE BAILEY, : : Plaintiff, : : v. : Civil Action No. 12-2042 (RC) : OCE BUSINESS SERVICES, INC. : : Defendant. :
MEMORANDUM OPINION
On December 24, 2013, the defendant has filed a renewed motion to dismiss the
complaint [ECF No. 22]. Because a ruling on the motion to dismiss potentially could dispose of
this case, the Court advised the pro se plaintiff of her obligations under the Federal Rules of
Civil Procedure and the rules of this Court. In addition, the Court advised the plaintiff that, if
she did not file an opposition or other response to the defendant’s renewed motion to dismiss by
January 24, 2014, the Court would treat the defendant’s motion as conceded and dismiss the
case. The Court since granted the plaintiff’s request for an extension of time, and set March 12,
2014 as the deadline for the plaintiff’s response. To date, the plaintiff neither has filed an
opposition nor has requested more time to do so. Accordingly, the Court will treat the
defendant’s motion as conceded. An Order accompanies this Memorandum Opinion.
DATE: April 11, 2014 /s/ RUDOLPH CONTRERAS United States District Court Judge
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
Bailey v. Oce Business Services Inc., Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/bailey-v-oce-business-services-inc-dcd-2014.