Bailey v. Oce Business Services Inc.

District Court, District of Columbia·Decided April 11, 2014·No. Civil Action No. 2012-2042·Published

Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA

NICOLE BAILEY, : : Plaintiff, : : v. : Civil Action No. 12-2042 (RC) : OCE BUSINESS SERVICES, INC. : : Defendant. :

MEMORANDUM OPINION

On December 24, 2013, the defendant has filed a renewed motion to dismiss the

complaint [ECF No. 22]. Because a ruling on the motion to dismiss potentially could dispose of

this case, the Court advised the pro se plaintiff of her obligations under the Federal Rules of

Civil Procedure and the rules of this Court. In addition, the Court advised the plaintiff that, if

she did not file an opposition or other response to the defendant’s renewed motion to dismiss by

January 24, 2014, the Court would treat the defendant’s motion as conceded and dismiss the

case. The Court since granted the plaintiff’s request for an extension of time, and set March 12,

2014 as the deadline for the plaintiff’s response. To date, the plaintiff neither has filed an

opposition nor has requested more time to do so. Accordingly, the Court will treat the

defendant’s motion as conceded. An Order accompanies this Memorandum Opinion.

DATE: April 11, 2014 /s/ RUDOLPH CONTRERAS United States District Court Judge

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Bailey v. Oce Business Services Inc., (D.D.C. 2014).

Bailey v. Oce Business Services Inc. (Bailey v. Oce Business Services Inc.) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.