Bailey v. New York State Division of Human Rights

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York

Bailey v. New York State Division of Human Rights

92 A.D.2d 610, 459 N.Y.S.2d 1018, 1983 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 16875

CourtAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

DecidedFebruary 28, 1983

StatusPublished

This text of 92 A.D.2d 610 (Bailey v. New York State Division of Human Rights) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Bailey v. New York State Division of Human Rights, 92 A.D.2d 610, 459 N.Y.S.2d 1018, 1983 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 16875 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1983).

Pincite

Opinion

Proceeding pursuant to section 298 of the Executive Law to review a determination of the State Human Rights Appeal Board dated June 14, 1982, which affirmed an order of the State Division of Human Rights dismissing petitioners’ complaints alleging discrimination in employment based on age. Determination confirmed and proceeding dismissed, without costs or disbursements. The findings of fact and [611]*611determination of the State Division of Human Rights, as affirmed by the State Human Rights Appeal Board, were supported by substantial evidence on the record considered as a whole (see 300 Gramatan Ave. Assoc, v State Div. of Human Rights, 45 NY2d 176). Damiani, J. P., Mangano, Thompson and O’Connor, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Proceeding pursuant to section 298 of the Executive Law to review a determination of the State Human Rights Appeal Board dated June 14, 1982, which affirmed an order of the State Division of Human Rights dismissing petitioners’ complaints alleging discrimination in employment based on age. Determination confirmed and proceeding dismissed, without costs or disbursements. The findings of fact and [611]*611determination of the State Division of Human Rights, as affirmed by the State Human Rights Appeal Board, were supported by substantial evidence on the record considered as a whole (see 300 Gramatan Ave. Assoc, v State Div. of Human Rights, 45 NY2d 176). Damiani, J. P., Mangano, Thompson and O’Connor, JJ., concur.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

92 A.D.2d 610, 459 N.Y.S.2d 1018, 1983 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 16875, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/bailey-v-new-york-state-division-of-human-rights-nyappdiv-1983.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack