Bailey v. McCuen

884 S.W.2d 937, 318 Ark. 106
Supreme Court of Arkansas·Decided September 27, 1994·No. 94-951·Published·Cited by 1 cases

Opinion

Per Curiam.

On September 20, 1994, the Honorable Tom Digby was duly appointed Master in this original action. Because of recent surgery, it is necessary to replace Judge Digby with the Honorable Darrell Hickman.

By this appointment Judge Hickman is directed to discharge the responsibilities assigned to the Master as set out in our Per Curiam of September 20, 1994.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Bailey v. McCuen, 884 S.W.2d 937, 318 Ark. 106 (Ark. 1994).

884 S.W.2d 937 (Bailey v. McCuen) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Bailey v. McCuen
891 S.W.2d 797 (Supreme Court of Arkansas, 1995)