Bailey v. . McCotter

Supreme Court of North Carolina

Bailey v. . McCotter

36 S.E.2d 918, 226 N.C. 160, 1946 N.C. LEXIS 397

DecidedFebruary 27, 1946

StatusPublished

This text of 36 S.E.2d 918 (Bailey v. . McCotter) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of North Carolina primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Bailey v. . McCotter, 36 S.E.2d 918, 226 N.C. 160, 1946 N.C. LEXIS 397 (N.C. 1946).

Pincite

Opinion

Per CuriaM.

In the trial below, the case was made to turn on a controverted issue of fact. This, the jury has resolved in favor of the defendant.

The motion to set aside the verdict as contrary to the weight of the evidence was addressed to the sound discretion of the trial court. Goodman v. Goodman, 201 N. C., 808, 161 S. E., 686. No reversible error has been made to appear. The verdict and judgment will be upheld.

No error.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Per CuriaM.

In the trial below, the case was made to turn on a controverted issue of fact. This, the jury has resolved in favor of the defendant.

The motion to set aside the verdict as contrary to the weight of the evidence was addressed to the sound discretion of the trial court. Goodman v. Goodman, 201 N. C., 808, 161 S. E., 686. No reversible error has been made to appear. The verdict and judgment will be upheld.

No error.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

36 S.E.2d 918, 226 N.C. 160, 1946 N.C. LEXIS 397, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/bailey-v-mccotter-nc-1946.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack