Bailey v. Lykins
This text of 8 Ky. Op. 205 (Bailey v. Lykins) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals of Kentucky primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
Opinion by
It is not necessary to decide whether or not a constable has the right to execute a warrant for forcible detainer.
In this case the appellee appeared at the trial in the county, and [206]*206made defense. He cannot, therefore, take advantage in the circuit court, upon the traverse, for want of proper service of the writ. Philips v. Harmon, et al., 1 Dana 468; Williamson v. Boucher, 7 J. J. Marsh. 252. The judgment of the justice or of the circuit court may still be carried out by the sheriff, and the rights of the appellee could not have been prejudiced by the summoning of the jury, or the service of the writ by the constable. The judgment of the circuit court quashing the warrant and the service thereof is reversed, and the cause remanded for a trial of the issue raised by the traverse.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
8 Ky. Op. 205, 1874 Ky. LEXIS 432, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/bailey-v-lykins-kyctapp-1874.