Bailey v. Knatt
This text of 207 So. 3d 407 (Bailey v. Knatt) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of Louisiana primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
Applying For Supervisory and/or Remedial Writs, Parish of E. Baton Rouge, 19th Judicial District Court Div. F, No. 628886; to the Court of Appeal, First Circuit, No. 2016 CW 0043.
| granted. Plaintiffs claim based on the loss of the chance of a better outcome is a theory of recovery arising from the same transaction or occurrence as her other claims and is not a separate cause of action. See Everything on Wheels Subaru, Inc. v. Subaru South, Inc., 616 So.2d 1234 (La. 1993). Accordingly, the judgment of the district court is reversed, and the case remanded for further proceedings.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
207 So. 3d 407, 2016 La. LEXIS 1873, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/bailey-v-knatt-la-2016.