Bailey v. Khoury

840 So. 2d 585, 2002 La.App. 4 Cir. 0199, 2002 La. App. LEXIS 2687, 2002 WL 2012421
Procedural entryThis page is a short order in Bailey v. Khoury. Read the opinion of the Court — 840 So. 2d 582
Louisiana Court of Appeal·Decided August 28, 2002·No. No. 2002-C-0227·Published

Opinions

JOAN BERNARD ARMSTRONG, Judge.

Relator Walgreen Louisiana Co., Inc’s, response to the Rule To Show Cause shows that Walgreen was not at fault as to the lateness of its writ application and, in fact, was diligent. It is in the interest of justice to allow Walgreen’s writ application to proceed.

The writ application is granted. For the reasons given in Bailey v. Khoury, et al, 2002-C-0049 (c/w 2002-C-0236), 840 So.2d 582, the plaintiffs claims against Walgreen Louisiana Co., Inc’s, are barred by prescription. Accordingly, plaintiffs claims are hereby dismissed.

WRIT GRANTED. DISMISSED.

MCKAY, J., dissents.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Bailey v. Khoury, 840 So. 2d 585, 2002 La.App. 4 Cir. 0199, 2002 La. App. LEXIS 2687, 2002 WL 2012421 (La. Ct. App. 2002).

840 So. 2d 585 (Bailey v. Khoury) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Bailey v. Khoury
840 So. 2d 582 (Louisiana Court of Appeal, 2002)