Bailey v. Keene

District Court of Appeal of Florida

Bailey v. Keene

122 So. 2d 498

CourtDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida

DecidedAugust 10, 1960

DocketNo. 1835

StatusPublished

Cited by5 cases

This text of 122 So. 2d 498 (Bailey v. Keene) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering District Court of Appeal of Florida primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Bailey v. Keene, 122 So. 2d 498 (Fla. Ct. App. 1960).

Pincite

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

This is a personal injury action. The circuit judge rendered a summary judgment for the defendant and the plaintiffs have appealed from this decision.

The plaintiff father had gone to the school which his minor daughter attended to get her. While there for that purpose he also decided to pick up his son and directed his daughter to go in search of him. This she did and then returned, calling to [499]*499her father that she could not find her brother. Thereupon, her father told her to come back to his car. She started across the street and was struck by the defendant’s automobile.

Without reciting any further details of the accident, we mention that the trial judge followed the case of Griffis v. Du Bow, Fla.App. 1959, 114 So.2d 207, as the basis for the entry of the judgment. We find no fault with the judge’s determination and uphold the judgment entered by him.

Affirmed.

ALLEN, C. J., and KANNER and SHANNON, TL, concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

PER CURIAM.

This is a personal injury action. The circuit judge rendered a summary judgment for the defendant and the plaintiffs have appealed from this decision.

The plaintiff father had gone to the school which his minor daughter attended to get her. While there for that purpose he also decided to pick up his son and directed his daughter to go in search of him. This she did and then returned, calling to [499]*499her father that she could not find her brother. Thereupon, her father told her to come back to his car. She started across the street and was struck by the defendant’s automobile.

Without reciting any further details of the accident, we mention that the trial judge followed the case of Griffis v. Du Bow, Fla.App. 1959, 114 So.2d 207, as the basis for the entry of the judgment. We find no fault with the judge’s determination and uphold the judgment entered by him.

Affirmed.

ALLEN, C. J., and KANNER and SHANNON, TL, concur.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

122 So. 2d 498, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/bailey-v-keene-fladistctapp-1960.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack