Bailey v. Hutchins

Supreme Court of Florida

Bailey v. Hutchins

105 So. 269, 90 Fla. 19

DecidedJune 11, 1925

StatusPublished

This text of 105 So. 269 (Bailey v. Hutchins) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of Florida primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Bailey v. Hutchins, 105 So. 269, 90 Fla. 19 (Fla. 1925).

Pincite

Opinions

Per Curiam.

This cause having heretofore been submitted to the Court upon the transcript of the record of the decree herein, and briefs and argument of counsel for the respective parties, and the record having been seen and inspected, and the Court being now advised of its judgment to be given in the premises, it seems to the Court that there is no error in the said decree; it is, therefore, considered, ordered and decreed by the Court that the said decree of the Circuit Court be, and the same is hereby, affirmed.

West, C. J., and Whitfield, Terrell and Strum, J. J., concur. Ellis, J., dissents.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Per Curiam.

This cause having heretofore been submitted to the Court upon the transcript of the record of the decree herein, and briefs and argument of counsel for the respective parties, and the record having been seen and inspected, and the Court being now advised of its judgment to be given in the premises, it seems to the Court that there is no error in the said decree; it is, therefore, considered, ordered and decreed by the Court that the said decree of the Circuit Court be, and the same is hereby, affirmed.

West, C. J., and Whitfield, Terrell and Strum, J. J., concur. Ellis, J., dissents.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

105 So. 269, 90 Fla. 19, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/bailey-v-hutchins-fla-1925.

Opinions

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack