Bailey v. Hood

80 P. 559, 38 Wash. 700, 1905 Wash. LEXIS 1237
CourtWashington Supreme Court
DecidedApril 17, 1905
DocketNo. 5251
StatusPublished
Cited by1 cases

This text of 80 P. 559 (Bailey v. Hood) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Washington Supreme Court primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Bailey v. Hood, 80 P. 559, 38 Wash. 700, 1905 Wash. LEXIS 1237 (Wash. 1905).

Opinion

Peb Curiam.

The original action was to foreclose tax liens. This appeal is from an order vacating the judgment in the original-action. Service of summons was had by publication, which directed the defendants to appear within sixty days after the date) of the first publication, to wit, within sixty days afier the 15th day of September, 1900; the date of the last publication was October- 27, 1900. Judgment of default was entered November 15, 1900. There were in all nineteen days between the date of the last publication and the day of judgment. This case falls squarely within the rule announced by this court in Woodham v. Anderson, 32 Wash. 500, 73 Pac. 536. There is no question as to laches, for it is a direct attack on a void judgment.

The judgment of the lower court is affirmed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

John Hancock Mutual Life Insurance v. Gooley
83 P.2d 221 (Washington Supreme Court, 1938)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
80 P. 559, 38 Wash. 700, 1905 Wash. LEXIS 1237, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/bailey-v-hood-wash-1905.