Bailey v. Harshman

Indiana Supreme Court

Bailey v. Harshman

60 Ind. 273

DecidedNovember 15, 1877

StatusPublished

This text of 60 Ind. 273 (Bailey v. Harshman) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Indiana Supreme Court primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Bailey v. Harshman, 60 Ind. 273 (Ind. 1877).

Pincite

Opinion

Howk, J.

The record of this cause, and the appellants’ assignment of errors thereon, present precisely the same questions for our decision, as those which were considered and decided in the case of Bailey v. Boyd, 59 Ind- 292; and, upon the authority of that case, and for the reasons there given, this cause must be decided as that was decided.

The judgment is therefore affirmed, at the costs of the appellants.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Howk, J.

The record of this cause, and the appellants’ assignment of errors thereon, present precisely the same questions for our decision, as those which were considered and decided in the case of Bailey v. Boyd, 59 Ind- 292; and, upon the authority of that case, and for the reasons there given, this cause must be decided as that was decided.

The judgment is therefore affirmed, at the costs of the appellants.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

60 Ind. 273, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/bailey-v-harshman-ind-1877.