Bailey v. Hampton Roads Regional Jail
This text of 589 F. App'x 230 (Bailey v. Hampton Roads Regional Jail) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
Affirmed by unpublished PER CURIAM opinion.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
Darrell Bailey appeals the district court’s order dismissing his civil action for failure to state a claim, pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1915A(b)(l) (2012), after concluding that his complaint alleged a tort claim not cognizable under 42 U.S.C. § 1983 (2012). We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. Bailey v. Hampton Roads Reg’l Jail, No. 2:14-cv-00199-AWA-TEM (E.D.Va. filed Oct. 20, 2014; entered Oct. 23, 2014). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before this court and argument would not aid the decisional process.
AFFIRMED.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
589 F. App'x 230, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/bailey-v-hampton-roads-regional-jail-ca4-2015.