Bailey v. Hampton Roads Regional Jail

589 F. App'x 230
CourtCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit
DecidedJanuary 21, 2015
DocketNo. 14-7648
StatusPublished

This text of 589 F. App'x 230 (Bailey v. Hampton Roads Regional Jail) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Bailey v. Hampton Roads Regional Jail, 589 F. App'x 230 (4th Cir. 2015).

Opinion

Affirmed by unpublished PER CURIAM opinion.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

PER CURIAM:

Darrell Bailey appeals the district court’s order dismissing his civil action for failure to state a claim, pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1915A(b)(l) (2012), after concluding that his complaint alleged a tort claim not cognizable under 42 U.S.C. § 1983 (2012). We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. Bailey v. Hampton Roads Reg’l Jail, No. 2:14-cv-00199-AWA-TEM (E.D.Va. filed Oct. 20, 2014; entered Oct. 23, 2014). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before this court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Screening
28 U.S.C. § 1915A(b)(l)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
589 F. App'x 230, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/bailey-v-hampton-roads-regional-jail-ca4-2015.