Bailey v. Grounds
This text of Bailey v. Grounds (Bailey v. Grounds) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering District Court, District of Columbia primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
I
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FILED FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA MAR 2 1 2011 Jeremy Ramone Bailey, ) Clerk. u.s. District & Bankruptcy Courts for the District of Columbia ) Petitioner, ) ) v. ) Civil Action No. ) Warden Dawn E. Grounds et at., ) ) Respondents. )
MEMORANDUM OPINION
Petitioner, proceeding pro se, has submitted an application for a writ of habeas corpus
along with an application to proceed in forma pauperis. The Court will grant the application to
proceed in forma pauperis and will dismiss the case for lack of jurisdiction.
Petitioner is a Texas state prisoner in New Boston, Texas, challenging a conviction
entered by the 71 5t Judicial District Court of Harrison County, Texas. See Pet. at 2, 5-6. Federal
court review of state convictions is available under 28 U.S.C. § 2254 only after the exhaustion of
available state remedies. See 28 U.S.C. §2254(b)(1). Thereafter, "an application for a writ of
habeas corpus [] made by a person in custody under the jUdgment and sentence of a State court ..
. may be filed in the district court for the district wherein such person is in custody or in the
district court for the district within which the State court was held which convicted and sentenced
[petitioner] and each of such district courts shall have concurrent jurisdiction to entertain the
application." 28 U.S.C. § 2241(d). Petitioner has no recourse here. A separate Order of
dismissal accompanies this Memorandum Opinion.
Un ed States DIstnct Judge
Date: March~, 2011
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
Bailey v. Grounds, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/bailey-v-grounds-dcd-2011.