Bailey v. FOREST PARK APARTMENTS
714 N.W.2d 329, 475 Mich. 873
This text of 714 N.W.2d 329 (Bailey v. FOREST PARK APARTMENTS) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Michigan Supreme Court primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Bluebook
Bailey v. FOREST PARK APARTMENTS, 714 N.W.2d 329, 475 Mich. 873 (Mich. 2006).
Opinion
Nicole BAILEY, Plaintiff-Appellee,
v.
FOREST PARK APARTMENTS, Individually and d/b/a Independent Management Services, Defendant-Appellant and
The Carswell Group, Defendant-Appellant, and
Comerica Bank, Garnishee-Defendant.
Supreme Court of Michigan.
On order of the Court, the application for leave to appeal the January 25, 2006 order of the Court of Appeals is considered, and it is DENIED, because we are not persuaded that the questions presented should be reviewed by this Court.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
Bluebook (online)
714 N.W.2d 329, 475 Mich. 873, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/bailey-v-forest-park-apartments-mich-2006.