Bailey v. FCI Berlin

District Court, D. New Hampshire·Decided May 20, 2022·No. 1:20-cv-00540·Unknown

Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT DISTRICT OF NEW HAMPSHIRE

Michael David Bailey

v. Case No. 20-cv-540-JL

FCI Berlin

ORDER

No objection having been filed, I herewith approve the Report and Recommendation of Magistrate Judge Andrea K. Johnstone dated April 19, 2022 . “‘[O]nly those issues fairly raised by the objections to the magistrate's report are subject to review in the district court and those not preserved by such objection are precluded on appeal.’” School Union No. 37 v. United Nat'l Ins. Co., 617 F.3d 554, 564 (1st Cir. 2010) (quoting Keating v. Secretary of Health & Human Servs., 848 F.2d 271, 275 (1st Cir.1988)); see also United States v. Valencia- Copete, 792 F.2d 4, 6 (1st Cir. 1986) (after proper notice, failure to file a specific objection to magistrate's report will waive the right to appeal).

____________________________ Joseph N. Laplante United States District Judge

Date: May 20, 2022

cc: Michael David Bailey, pro se Seth R. Aframe, AUSA

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Bailey v. FCI Berlin, (D.N.H. 2022).

Bailey v. FCI Berlin (Bailey v. FCI Berlin) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related