Bailey v. FCI Berlin
Opinion
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT DISTRICT OF NEW HAMPSHIRE
Michael David Bailey
v. Case No. 20-cv-540-JL
FCI Berlin
ORDER
No objection having been filed, I herewith approve the Report and Recommendation of Magistrate Judge Andrea K. Johnstone dated April 19, 2022 . “‘[O]nly those issues fairly raised by the objections to the magistrate's report are subject to review in the district court and those not preserved by such objection are precluded on appeal.’” School Union No. 37 v. United Nat'l Ins. Co., 617 F.3d 554, 564 (1st Cir. 2010) (quoting Keating v. Secretary of Health & Human Servs., 848 F.2d 271, 275 (1st Cir.1988)); see also United States v. Valencia- Copete, 792 F.2d 4, 6 (1st Cir. 1986) (after proper notice, failure to file a specific objection to magistrate's report will waive the right to appeal).
____________________________ Joseph N. Laplante United States District Judge
Date: May 20, 2022
cc: Michael David Bailey, pro se Seth R. Aframe, AUSA
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Bailey v. FCI Berlin (Bailey v. FCI Berlin) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.