Bailey v. Deutsche Bank Trust Co. Americas
This text of 632 F. App'x 315 (Bailey v. Deutsche Bank Trust Co. Americas) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
In this action challenging the non-judicial foreclosure sale of his Missouri residence, Joe Bailey appeals after the district court 1 granted a Fed.R.Civ.P. 12(b)(6) motion to dismiss his complaint. Upon careful de novo review, see Levy v. Ohl, 477 F.3d 988, 991 (8th Cir.2007) (standard of review), we conclude that the complaint was properly dismissed, as nothing in Bailey’s complaint indicated that the challenged conduct was carried out by a party that was not the lawful holder of his promissory note. See Lackey v. Wells Fargo Bank, N.A., 747 F.3d 1033, 1037-38 (8th Cir.2014) (discussing rights and powers of holder of promissory note under Missouri law); see also Fullington v. Pfizer, Inc., *316 720 F.3d 739, 747 (8th Cir.2013) (appellate court may affirm on any basis supported by record).
Accordingly, we affirm. See 8th Cir. R. 47B.
. The Honorable Ortrie D. Smith, United States District Judge for the Western District of Missouri.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
632 F. App'x 315, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/bailey-v-deutsche-bank-trust-co-americas-ca8-2016.