Bailey v. Crowell

32 N.Y.S. 1138, 11 Misc. 707, 65 N.Y. St. Rep. 869
CourtNew York Court of Common Pleas
DecidedFebruary 4, 1895
StatusPublished

This text of 32 N.Y.S. 1138 (Bailey v. Crowell) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering New York Court of Common Pleas primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Bailey v. Crowell, 32 N.Y.S. 1138, 11 Misc. 707, 65 N.Y. St. Rep. 869 (N.Y. Super. Ct. 1895).

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

The return bears record of the fact that an assignment to the landlord in this proceeding of the lease from Becar et al. to Gano was received in evidence on behalf of the plaintiff. We fail to find such exhibit annexed to the return, and are unable to satisfactorily determine this appeal in the absence of a complete record. Reargument ordered for February additional general term, return to be amended meanwhile.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
32 N.Y.S. 1138, 11 Misc. 707, 65 N.Y. St. Rep. 869, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/bailey-v-crowell-nyctcompl-1895.