Bailey v. Commonwealth
This text of 5 Rawle 59 (Bailey v. Commonwealth) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of Pennsylvania primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
This indictment seems to have been drawn with an eye to the case of Wilson v. The Commonwealth, the circumstances of which are nearly the same; where it was held that the fee of twenty five cents allowed specifically by the fee bill then in force, for a copy of the judgment, was all that the party was bound to tender for a copy of the proceedings at large. This fee of twenty five cents is reduced by the present fee bill to eighteen cents and three quarters of a cent; but the phraseology as to this and almost all other items'remains the same. The decision then is in point, and being on the only exception argued here, disposes of the case.
Judgment affirmed.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
5 Rawle 59, 1835 Pa. LEXIS 6, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/bailey-v-commonwealth-pa-1835.