Bailey v. Client Servs., Inc.

Missouri Court of Appeals

Bailey v. Client Servs., Inc.

571 S.W.3d 245

Missouri Court of Appeals·Decided April 9, 2019·No. No. ED 107066·Published

Opinion

PER CURIAM

Amanda Bailey appeals from the decision of the Labor and Industrial Relations Commission ("Commission") denying her unemployment benefits. We have reviewed the briefs of the parties and the record on appeal and conclude the Commission's decision is supported by competent and substantial evidence in the record and no errors of law appear within the decision. An extended opinion would have no precedential value. We have provided a memorandum setting forth the reasons for our decision to the parties for their use only.

We affirm the decision pursuant to Missouri Rule of Civil Procedure 84.16(b)(4-5).

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

PER CURIAM

Amanda Bailey appeals from the decision of the Labor and Industrial Relations Commission ("Commission") denying her unemployment benefits. We have reviewed the briefs of the parties and the record on appeal and conclude the Commission's decision is supported by competent and substantial evidence in the record and no errors of law appear within the decision. An extended opinion would have no precedential value. We have provided a memorandum setting forth the reasons for our decision to the parties for their use only.

We affirm the decision pursuant to Missouri Rule of Civil Procedure 84.16(b)(4-5).

Bailey v. Client Servs., Inc., 571 S.W.3d 245 (Mo. Ct. App. 2019).

Pincite

571 S.W.3d 245 (Bailey v. Client Servs., Inc.) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.