Bailey v. Claflin

The Superior Court of New York City

Bailey v. Claflin

36 N.Y. St. Rep. 82

CourtThe Superior Court of New York City

DecidedJanuary 5, 1891

StatusPublished

This text of 36 N.Y. St. Rep. 82 (Bailey v. Claflin) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering The Superior Court of New York City primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Bailey v. Claflin, 36 N.Y. St. Rep. 82 (N.Y. Super. Ct. 1891).

Pincite

Opinion

Per Curiam.

This case appears to have been tried on the same testimony upon which the case of Eckhardt against the same defendant was tried, and the report of the referee and the judgment entered thereon were substantially the same in both cases. That case was appealed to this court and affirmed.

. As the same questions were presented in both' cases it follows that the judgment appealed from should be affirmed, with, costs, on the opinion in Eckhardt v. Epstein, 33 N. Y. State Rep., 806.

Sedgwick, Ch. J., Freedman and Ingraham, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Per Curiam.

This case appears to have been tried on the same testimony upon which the case of Eckhardt against the same defendant was tried, and the report of the referee and the judgment entered thereon were substantially the same in both cases. That case was appealed to this court and affirmed.

. As the same questions were presented in both' cases it follows that the judgment appealed from should be affirmed, with, costs, on the opinion in Eckhardt v. Epstein, 33 N. Y. State Rep., 806.

Sedgwick, Ch. J., Freedman and Ingraham, JJ., concur.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

36 N.Y. St. Rep. 82, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/bailey-v-claflin-nysuperctnyc-1891.