Bailey v. City of Tampa

Supreme Court of Florida

Bailey v. City of Tampa

175 So. 2d 533, 1965 Fla. LEXIS 3168

Supreme Court of Florida·Decided May 12, 1965·No. No. 33558·Published·Cited by 1 cases

Opinions

PER CURIAM.

Upon careful re-examination of the record in the light of oral argument, we are [534]*534convinced there is no conflict between the decision of the District Court of Appeal and any decision of this Court or another District Court of Appeal justifying- exercise of jurisdiction by this Court, so the writ of certiorari is discharged.

THOMAS, Acting C. J., and THOR-NAL, O’CONNELL and CALDWELL, JJ., concur. ERVIN, J., dissents with opinion.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

PER CURIAM.

Upon careful re-examination of the record in the light of oral argument, we are [534]*534convinced there is no conflict between the decision of the District Court of Appeal and any decision of this Court or another District Court of Appeal justifying- exercise of jurisdiction by this Court, so the writ of certiorari is discharged.

THOMAS, Acting C. J., and THOR-NAL, O’CONNELL and CALDWELL, JJ., concur. ERVIN, J., dissents with opinion.

Bailey v. City of Tampa, 175 So. 2d 533, 1965 Fla. LEXIS 3168 (Fla. 1965).

Pincite

175 So. 2d 533 (Bailey v. City of Tampa) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Opinions

Related