Home/Supreme Court of Florida/Bailey v. City of Tampa

Bailey v. City of Tampa

175 So. 2d 533, 1965 Fla. LEXIS 3168
CourtSupreme Court of Florida
DecidedMay 12, 1965
DocketNo. 33558
StatusPublished
Cited by1 cases

This text of 175 So. 2d 533 (Bailey v. City of Tampa) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of Florida primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Bailey v. City of Tampa, 175 So. 2d 533, 1965 Fla. LEXIS 3168 (Fla. 1965).

Opinions

PER CURIAM.

Upon careful re-examination of the record in the light of oral argument, we are [534]*534convinced there is no conflict between the decision of the District Court of Appeal and any decision of this Court or another District Court of Appeal justifying- exercise of jurisdiction by this Court, so the writ of certiorari is discharged.

THOMAS, Acting C. J., and THOR-NAL, O’CONNELL and CALDWELL, JJ., concur. ERVIN, J., dissents with opinion.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Artz v. City of Tampa
102 So. 3d 747 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 2012)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
175 So. 2d 533, 1965 Fla. LEXIS 3168, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/bailey-v-city-of-tampa-fla-1965.