Bailey v. Chandler

Supreme Court of Minnesota

Bailey v. Chandler

6 N.W. 480, 27 Minn. 174, 1880 Minn. LEXIS 49

CourtSupreme Court of Minnesota

DecidedSeptember 13, 1880

StatusPublished

Cited by1 cases

This text of 6 N.W. 480 (Bailey v. Chandler) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of Minnesota primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Bailey v. Chandler, 6 N.W. 480, 27 Minn. 174, 1880 Minn. LEXIS 49 (Mich. 1880).

Pincite

Opinion

Gilfillan, C. J.

On the good faith of the transaction between plaintiff and E. S. Bailey, the evidence is such that the verdict is conclusive.

We are inclined to think the affidavit served by plaintiff on the sheriff good, though we do not decide the point, for, the property having been taken from the possession of the plaintiff, no affidavit was necessary. Butler v. White, 25 Minn. 432; Moulton v. Thompson, 26 Minn. 120; Jones v. Town, 26 Minn. 172.

Order affirmed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Gilfillan, C. J.

On the good faith of the transaction between plaintiff and E. S. Bailey, the evidence is such that the verdict is conclusive.

We are inclined to think the affidavit served by plaintiff on the sheriff good, though we do not decide the point, for, the property having been taken from the possession of the plaintiff, no affidavit was necessary. Butler v. White, 25 Minn. 432; Moulton v. Thompson, 26 Minn. 120; Jones v. Town, 26 Minn. 172.

Order affirmed.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

6 N.W. 480, 27 Minn. 174, 1880 Minn. LEXIS 49, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/bailey-v-chandler-minn-1880.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack