Bailey v. Bd. of Supervisors of San Joaquin Cty.
4 P. 768, 66 Cal. 10, 1884 Cal. LEXIS 664
This text of 4 P. 768 (Bailey v. Bd. of Supervisors of San Joaquin Cty.) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering California Supreme Court primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Bluebook
Bailey v. Bd. of Supervisors of San Joaquin Cty., 4 P. 768, 66 Cal. 10, 1884 Cal. LEXIS 664 (Cal. 1884).
Opinion
We are of opinion that the Act of 1880 (Stat. 1880, p. 35, amending Code Civil Proc., § 110), fixing the terms of office of justices of the peace at two years from the first day of January next succeeding their election, is constitutional, and that these officers are to be elected this year.
Let the writ issue as prayed for.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Powers v. City of Richmond
893 P.2d 1160 (California Supreme Court, 1995)
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
Bluebook (online)
4 P. 768, 66 Cal. 10, 1884 Cal. LEXIS 664, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/bailey-v-bd-of-supervisors-of-san-joaquin-cty-cal-1884.