Bailey v. Bailey

6 Sarat. Ch. Sent. 37
CourtNew York Court of Chancery
DecidedAugust 24, 1846
StatusPublished

This text of 6 Sarat. Ch. Sent. 37 (Bailey v. Bailey) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering New York Court of Chancery primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Bailey v. Bailey, 6 Sarat. Ch. Sent. 37 (N.Y. 1846).

Opinion

Exceptions to master’s report disallowing exceptions to the answer of James Bailey 2d, for insufficiency. Order overruling exceptions to report, and directing complainant to pay the costs of the reference and upon the exceptions to report, to be taxed. Such costs to be offsett against the amount due complainant on his judgment, against James Bailey 2d.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
6 Sarat. Ch. Sent. 37, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/bailey-v-bailey-nychanct-1846.