Bailey v. Bailey
171 A. 797, 115 N.J. Eq. 565, 1934 N.J. LEXIS 776
This text of 171 A. 797 (Bailey v. Bailey) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of New Jersey primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Bluebook
Bailey v. Bailey, 171 A. 797, 115 N.J. Eq. 565, 1934 N.J. LEXIS 776 (N.J. 1934).
Opinion
The decree appealed from will be affirmed, for the reasons expressed in the opinion of Advisory Master Grosman, delivered in the court of chancery.
For affirmance — The Chief-Justice, Teenchabd, Paekee, Lloyd, Case, Bodine, Hehee, Peeskie, Van Buskiek, Kays, Hetfield, Deae, Wells, Dill, JJ. 14.
For reversal — None.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Huster v. Huster
165 A.2d 305 (New Jersey Superior Court App Division, 1960)
Manley v. Manley
164 A.2d 113 (Superior Court of Pennsylvania, 1960)
Willis v. Willis
274 S.W.2d 621 (Missouri Court of Appeals, 1954)
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
Bluebook (online)
171 A. 797, 115 N.J. Eq. 565, 1934 N.J. LEXIS 776, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/bailey-v-bailey-nj-1934.