Bailey v. Bailey

171 A. 797, 115 N.J. Eq. 565, 1934 N.J. LEXIS 776

Supreme Court of New Jersey·Decided April 12, 1934·Published·Cited by 4 cases

Opinion

Pee Cueiam.

The decree appealed from will be affirmed, for the reasons expressed in the opinion of Advisory Master Grosman, delivered in the court of chancery.

For affirmance — The Chief-Justice, Teenchabd, Paekee, Lloyd, Case, Bodine, Hehee, Peeskie, Van Buskiek, Kays, Hetfield, Deae, Wells, Dill, JJ. 14.

For reversal — None.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Bailey v. Bailey, 171 A. 797, 115 N.J. Eq. 565, 1934 N.J. LEXIS 776 (N.J. 1934).

Pincite

171 A. 797 (Bailey v. Bailey) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.