Bailey v. Bailey

10 N.W. 359, 47 Mich. 648, 1881 Mich. LEXIS 491
Michigan Supreme Court·Decided October 27, 1881·Published

Opinion

Per Curiam.

This case was before the court several terms since and we affirmed a judgment in favor of defendants in error. 36 Mich. 181.

They have again recovered on a new trial taken by the plaintiff in error under the statute, and another review in this court is claimed.

[649] Tbe defendant Emily J. S. Bailey has deceased since the former hearing. We have examined the record with the assistance of the learned counsel, with attention; and we are not able to discover anything worthy of comment to cause any distinction between the case as it now appears and as it appeared on the previous hearing.

Every material point now urged was we think considered and decided at that time and a rediscussion would not be profitable.

The judgment is affirmed with costs.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Bailey v. Bailey, 10 N.W. 359, 47 Mich. 648, 1881 Mich. LEXIS 491 (Mich. 1881).

10 N.W. 359 (Bailey v. Bailey) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Bailey v. Bailey
36 Mich. 181 (Michigan Supreme Court, 1877)