Bailey v. Bailey
227 So. 3d 768, 2017 WL 4583015
CourtDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida
DecidedOctober 16, 2017
DocketCASE NO. 1D17-453
StatusPublished
Cited by1 cases
This text of 227 So. 3d 768 (Bailey v. Bailey) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering District Court of Appeal of Florida primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Bluebook
Bailey v. Bailey, 227 So. 3d 768, 2017 WL 4583015 (Fla. Ct. App. 2017).
Opinion
In this post-dissolution appeal, we agree with the former wife that the trial court erred in requiring the parties to equally split the responsibility of transportation for timesharing because that issue was not pled or tried by consent. Accordingly, we reverse that portion of the challenged order. In all other respects, we affirm the order.1
AFFIRMED in part; REVERSED in part.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
JEKTOR AYALA v. JARISEL VEGA
District Court of Appeal of Florida, 2023
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
Bluebook (online)
227 So. 3d 768, 2017 WL 4583015, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/bailey-v-bailey-fladistctapp-2017.