Bailey Mortgage Co. v. Gobble-Fite Lumber Co.

571 So. 2d 1104, 1990 Ala. LEXIS 1063, 1990 WL 226679
Supreme Court of Alabama·Decided November 30, 1990·No. 89-1221·Published

Opinion

MADDOX, Justice.

The judgment of the trial court is reversed, and this cause is remanded for further proceedings on the authority of Bailey Mortgage Co. v. Gobble-Fite Lumber Co., 565 So.2d 138 (Ala.1990), wherein this Court held that “the holder of a prior mortgage that is superior to a mechanic’s or materialman’s lien who forecloses and purchases the property at the foreclosure sale does not lose its priority.” 565 So.2d at 143.

REVERSED AND REMANDED.

HORNSBY, C.J., and ALMON and ADAMS, JJ., concur. STEAGALL, J., concurs in the result.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Bailey Mortgage Co. v. Gobble-Fite Lumber Co., 571 So. 2d 1104, 1990 Ala. LEXIS 1063, 1990 WL 226679 (Ala. 1990).

571 So. 2d 1104 (Bailey Mortgage Co. v. Gobble-Fite Lumber Co.) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Bailey Mortg. Co. v. Gobble-Fite Lumber Co.
565 So. 2d 138 (Supreme Court of Alabama, 1990)