Bailey-Mora Co. v. United States
19 Cust. Ct. 209, 1947 Cust. Ct. LEXIS 1253
CourtUnited States Customs Court
DecidedJune 30, 1947
DocketNo. 7324; Entry Nos. 901; 980
StatusPublished
This text of 19 Cust. Ct. 209 (Bailey-Mora Co. v. United States) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering United States Customs Court primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Bluebook
Bailey-Mora Co. v. United States, 19 Cust. Ct. 209, 1947 Cust. Ct. LEXIS 1253 (cusc 1947).
Opinion
These are appeals for reappraisement of chairs imported from Mexico.
At the trial, counsel for the plaintiff stated:
* * * The advance in value is so insignificant that to try to establish any of the facts would in any event refute it, because we have to go to Mexico to establish the fluctuating market.
Consequently, since there was a fluctuating market and there could have been an honest difference of opinion, we are willing to abandon, because we feel that we will get our best relief from the petition for remission of additional duties, which is a greater sum.
Judge Cline: Then this case is abandoned without prejudice as to the good faith in the remission case; is that what you want?
Mr. Stein: That is right.
Mr. Welsh: You can say Mr. Welsh makes that concession upon the advice of the Appraiser, Mr. Kleinman,
The appeals for reappraisement are therefore dismissed without prejudice as to the good, faith in the remission case. Judgment will be rendered accordingly.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
Bluebook (online)
19 Cust. Ct. 209, 1947 Cust. Ct. LEXIS 1253, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/bailey-mora-co-v-united-states-cusc-1947.