Bailey-Felton v. Felton

90 A.D.3d 652, 933 N.Y.2d 900
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York·Decided December 6, 2011·Published·Cited by 2 cases

Opinion

[653] “The determination of whether a family offense was committed is a factual issue to be resolved by the Family Court, and its determinations regarding the credibility of witnesses are entitled to great weight on appeal” (Matter of Genzen v Genzen, 74 AD3d 1196 [2010]). Here, the record supports the Family Court’s determination that the petitioner established, by a preponderance of the evidence, that the appellant committed certain family offenses, and also reveals the existence of aggravating circumstances justifying the Family Court’s five-year order of protection with respect to the petitioner and the parties’ two youngest children (see Matter of Williams v Maise, 85 AD3d 933 [2011]; Matter of Kaur v Singh, 73 AD3d 1178 [2010]; Matter of Gonzalez v Acosta, 73 AD3d 921 [2010]; Matter of Dell’Isola v Dell’lsola, 19 AD3d 488 [2005]).

The appellant’s remaining contentions are without merit. Florio, J.E, Balkin, Belen and Chambers, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Bailey-Felton v. Felton, 90 A.D.3d 652, 933 N.Y.2d 900 (N.Y. Ct. App. 2011).

90 A.D.3d 652 (Bailey-Felton v. Felton) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Hubbard v. DeLeon
108 A.D.3d 628 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 2013)