Bailets v. Pennsylvania Turnpike Commission
168 A.3d 172
CourtSupreme Court of Pennsylvania
DecidedAugust 23, 2017
DocketNo. 126 MAP 2016; No. 23 MAP 2017
StatusPublished
This text of 168 A.3d 172 (Bailets v. Pennsylvania Turnpike Commission) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of Pennsylvania primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Bluebook
Bailets v. Pennsylvania Turnpike Commission, 168 A.3d 172 (Pa. 2017).
Opinion
[173]*173ORDER
AND NOW, this 23rd day of August, 2017, oral argument is GRANTED, LIMITED to the following issue raised in the appeal docketed at 126 MAP 2016, as phrased by appellant:
“Was the award of $1.6 million in ‘non-economic damages’ proper where the Whistleblower Law does not permit such damages and where the amount of non-economic damages awarded was arbitrary, excessive, and lacking in any rational basis in the record?”
The Commonwealth Court’s order is AFFIRMED in all other respects. The appeal and ancillary petition at 23 MAP 2017 are DISMISSED as MOOT.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
Bluebook (online)
168 A.3d 172, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/bailets-v-pennsylvania-turnpike-commission-pa-2017.