Bailets v. Pennsylvania Turnpike Commission

Supreme Court of Pennsylvania

Bailets v. Pennsylvania Turnpike Commission

168 A.3d 172

Procedural entryThis page is a short order in Bailets v. Pennsylvania Turnpike Commission. Read the opinion of the Court — 633 Pa. 1 →

Supreme Court of Pennsylvania·Decided August 23, 2017·No. No. 126 MAP 2016; No. 23 MAP 2017·Published

Opinion

[173]*173ORDER

PER CURIAM

AND NOW, this 23rd day of August, 2017, oral argument is GRANTED, LIMITED to the following issue raised in the appeal docketed at 126 MAP 2016, as phrased by appellant:

“Was the award of $1.6 million in ‘non-economic damages’ proper where the Whistleblower Law does not permit such damages and where the amount of non-economic damages awarded was arbitrary, excessive, and lacking in any rational basis in the record?”

The Commonwealth Court’s order is AFFIRMED in all other respects. The appeal and ancillary petition at 23 MAP 2017 are DISMISSED as MOOT.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

[173]*173ORDER

PER CURIAM

AND NOW, this 23rd day of August, 2017, oral argument is GRANTED, LIMITED to the following issue raised in the appeal docketed at 126 MAP 2016, as phrased by appellant:

“Was the award of $1.6 million in ‘non-economic damages’ proper where the Whistleblower Law does not permit such damages and where the amount of non-economic damages awarded was arbitrary, excessive, and lacking in any rational basis in the record?”

The Commonwealth Court’s order is AFFIRMED in all other respects. The appeal and ancillary petition at 23 MAP 2017 are DISMISSED as MOOT.

Bailets v. Pennsylvania Turnpike Commission, 168 A.3d 172 (Pa. 2017).

Pincite

168 A.3d 172 (Bailets v. Pennsylvania Turnpike Commission) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.