Baier v. City of Rochester

98 A.D.2d 991, 470 N.Y.S.2d 248, 1983 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 21344
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York·Decided December 16, 1983·Published·Cited by 1 cases

Opinion

— Order unanimously modified by deleting therefrom the fourth ordering paragraph thereof and, as modified, affirmed, without costs. Memorandum: We find no abuse of discretion in Special Term’s decision to [992]*992grant claimant leave to file a late notice of claim where the application was only 15 days late. However, Special Term erred in ruling upon the need for prior written notice of the defect as a condition precedent to maintenance of the lawsuit. The sole issue before the court was whether a late notice of claim should be allowed. (Appeal from order of Supreme Court, Monroe County, Provenzano, J. — late notice of claim.) Present —• Dillon, P. J., Doerr, Denman, O’Donnell and Moule, JJ.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Baier v. City of Rochester, 98 A.D.2d 991, 470 N.Y.S.2d 248, 1983 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 21344 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1983).

98 A.D.2d 991 (Baier v. City of Rochester) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Pierce v. Town of Arkwright
147 A.D.2d 981 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 1989)