Bai (Xiao) Vs. State

Nevada Supreme Court·Decided December 3, 2021·No. 83813·Published

Opinion

IN THE SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEVADA

XIAO YE BAI, No. 83813 Appellant,

vs.

THE STATE OF NEVADA, FILED

Respondent. DEC 3 2021 A. BROWN PREME COURT

UY

ORDER DISMISSING APPEAL

This is a pro se appeal from a judgment of conviction. Eighth Judicial District Court, Clark County; Eric Johnson, Judge.

This court's review of this appeal reveals a jurisdictional defect.

Specifically, the district court entered the judgment of conviction on September 10, 2021. Appellant did not file the notice of appeal, however, until November 16, 2021, well after the expiration of the 30-day appeal period prescribed by NRAP 4(b). This court lacks jurisdiction to entertain an untimely appeal. See Lozada v. State, 110 Nev. 349, 352, 871 P.2d 944, 946 (1994) (explaining that an untimely notice of appeal fails to vest jurisdiction in this court). To the extent, if any, that appellant's appeal is in regard to the postconviction motion to withdraw a guilty plea, no decision, oral or written, has been made on the motion. Accordingly, this court ORDERS this appeal DISMISSED.

9ar 600160160giremm7

raguirre

,J ,J Stiglich Silver

cc: Hon. Eric Johnson, District Judge Xiao Ye Bai Attorney General/Carson City Clark County District Attorney Eighth District Court Clerk

SUPREME COURT OF NEVADA

agairAo

tOf 1947A

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Bai (Xiao) Vs. State, (Neb. 2021).

Bai (Xiao) Vs. State (Bai (Xiao) Vs. State) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Lozada v. State
871 P.2d 944 (Nevada Supreme Court, 1994)