Bai (Xiao) Vs. State
Opinion
IN THE SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEVADA
XIAO YE BAI, No. 83813 Appellant,
vs.
THE STATE OF NEVADA, FILED
Respondent. DEC 3 2021 A. BROWN PREME COURT
UY
ORDER DISMISSING APPEAL
This is a pro se appeal from a judgment of conviction. Eighth Judicial District Court, Clark County; Eric Johnson, Judge.
This court's review of this appeal reveals a jurisdictional defect.
Specifically, the district court entered the judgment of conviction on September 10, 2021. Appellant did not file the notice of appeal, however, until November 16, 2021, well after the expiration of the 30-day appeal period prescribed by NRAP 4(b). This court lacks jurisdiction to entertain an untimely appeal. See Lozada v. State, 110 Nev. 349, 352, 871 P.2d 944, 946 (1994) (explaining that an untimely notice of appeal fails to vest jurisdiction in this court). To the extent, if any, that appellant's appeal is in regard to the postconviction motion to withdraw a guilty plea, no decision, oral or written, has been made on the motion. Accordingly, this court ORDERS this appeal DISMISSED.
9ar 600160160giremm7
raguirre
,J ,J Stiglich Silver
cc: Hon. Eric Johnson, District Judge Xiao Ye Bai Attorney General/Carson City Clark County District Attorney Eighth District Court Clerk
SUPREME COURT OF NEVADA
agairAo
tOf 1947A
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Bai (Xiao) Vs. State (Bai (Xiao) Vs. State) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.