Bai v. State of Nevada
Opinion
1 2 5 XIAO YE BAI, Case No. 2:20-cv-02042-KJD-NJK 6 Petitioner, 4 Vv. ORDER STATE OF NEVADA, et al., 9 Respondents. 10 Good cause appearing, the Court grants Petitioner’s second unopposed motion for 11 extension of time (ECF No. 22). Petitioner has until September 24, 2021 to file his second amended 12 petition. 13 Petitioner at all times remains responsible for calculating the running of the federal 14 limitation period and timely presenting claims. That is, by setting a deadline to amend the petition 15 and/or by granting any extension thereof, the Court makes no finding or representation that the 16 petition, any amendments thereto, and/or any claims contained therein are not subject to dismissal 17 as untimely. See Sossa v. Diaz, 729 F.3d 1225, 1235 (9th Cir. 2013). 18 IT IS THEREFORE ORDERED that Petitioner Xiao Ye Bai’s Motion for Extension of 19 Time (ECF No. 22) is GRANTED. 20 DATED: August 19, 2021 ™ 21 iC _) 22 KENT J. DAWSON 53 UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE
24 25 26 27 28
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Bai v. State of Nevada (Bai v. State of Nevada) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.