Bahrikyan v. Transamerica Life Ins. Co.

District Court, E.D. California·Decided November 4, 2022·No. 2:22-cv-00894·Unknown

Opinion

1 || Kevin W. Harris (SBN 133084) Attorney at Law 2 || 1387 Garden HWy2 Ste. 200 Sacramento CA 95833 3 || Telephone: 916.271.0688 4 Facsimile: 855.800.4454 Attorney for Plaintiff 5 ZOHRAB BAHRIKYAN 6 || John T. Burnite een 16223) McDOWELL HETHERINGTON LLP 7 || 1999 Harrison Street, Suite 2050 Oakland, CA 94612 8 || Telephone: 510.628.2145 Facimile: 510.628.2146 9 || Email: john.burnite@mhllp.com 10 || Jarrett E. Ganer (Admitted Pro Hac Vice) Micah A. Grodin (dmitted Pro Hac rice) 11 | MCDOWELL HETHERINGTON LL 1001 Fannin Street, Suite 2700 12 || Houston, TX 77002 Telephone: 713-337-5580 13 || Facsimile: 713-337-8850 Email: jarrett. ganer@mhllp.com 14 |) Email: micah.grodin@mhllp.com IS || Attorneys for Defendant 16 || FRANSAMERICA 7 LIFE INSURANCE COMPANY

18 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 1? EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 20 ZOHRAB BAHRIKYAN, No. 2:22-cv-0894 MCE DB 21 Plaintiff, STIPULATED PROTECTIVE 22 ORDER V. 23 TRANSAMERICA LIFE INSURANCE 24 ||COMPANY and DOES | through 40, inclusive, 25 Defendants. 26 27 28 STIPULATED PROTECTIVE ORDER

1. PURPOSES AND LIMITATIONS/GOOD CAUSE STATEMENT 2 Disclosure and discovery activity in this action are likely to involve production 3 || of confidential and proprietary actuarial, business, technical, and financial 4 || information from Transamerica Life Insurance Company (“TLIC”) as well as private 5 || information of Plaintiff Zohrab Bahrikyan or the insured for which special protection 6 || from public disclosure and from use for any purpose other than prosecuting this 7 || litigation may be warranted. Accordingly, Plaintiff and Defendant Transamerica Life 8 || Insurance Company (“TLIC”) hereby stipulate to and petition the Court to enter the 9 || following Stipulated Protective Order (“Order”). The parties acknowledge that this 10 || Order does not confer blanket protections on all disclosures or responses to discovery 11 || and that the protection it affords from public disclosure and use extends only to the 12 || limited information or items that are entitled to confidential treatment under the 13 || applicable legal principles. The parties further acknowledge, as set forth in Section 14 || 12.3 (Filing Protected Material), below, that this Protective Order does not entitle 15 || them to file confidential information under seal; Local Rule 141 sets forth the 16 || procedures that must be followed and the standards that will be applied when a party 17 || seeks permission from the Court to file material under seal. Nothing in this order 18 || shall limit the testimony of parties or non-parties, or the use of certain documents, at 19 }| any court hearing or trial. Such determinations will only be made by the court at the 20 || hearing or trial, or upon an appropriate motion. 21 Any document that is not confidential, privileged, or otherwise protectable in 22 || its entirety will not be filed under seal if the confidential portions can be redacted. If 23 || documents can be redacted, then a redacted version for public viewing, omitting only 24 || the confidential, privileged, or otherwise protectable portions of the document, shall 25 || be filed. Any application that seeks to file documents under seal in their entirety 26 || should include an explanation of why redaction is not feasible. 27 28 oo PAGEIT—STIPULATED PROTECTIVE □□□□□□□□□□□□□□□□□□□□□□□□□□□□□

2. DEFINITIONS 2 2.1 Acknowledgment: the “Acknowledgment and Agreement to be Bound” 3 || form attached as Exhibit A to this Order. 4 2.2 Action: Zohrab Bahrikyan v. Transamerica Life Insurance Company, 5 |} Case No. 2:22-cv-00894-MCE-DB. 6 2.3 Challenging Party: A party or non-party that challenges the designation 7 || of information or items under this Order. 8 2.4 “CONFIDENTIAL” Information or Items: Confidential and proprietary 9 || actuarial, business, technical, and financial information from TLIC as well as private 10 || information of Plaintiff Zohrab Bahrikyan or the insured which is not generally 11 || known or publicly available and which the designating party would not normally 12 || reveal to third parties or information (regardless of how it is generated, stored, or 13 || maintained) that otherwise meets the standard for protection set forth in Rule 26© of 14 || the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure. It is the intent of the parties that information 15 || will not be designated as confidential for tactical reasons and that nothing be so 16 || designated without a good faith belief that it has been maintained in a confidential 17 || non-public manner, and there is good cause why it should not be part of the public 18 || record of this Action. 19 2.5 Counsel (without qualifier): Outside Counsel of Record and House 20 || Counsel (as well as their support staff). 21 2.6 Designating Party: A party or non-party that designates information or 22 || items that it produces or that are produced in disclosures or in response to discovery 23 || as “CONFIDENTIAL.” 24 2.7 Disclosure or Discovery Material: All items or information, regardless 25 || of the medium or manner in which it is generated, stored, or maintained (including, 26 || among other things, testimony, transcripts, and tangible things), that are produced or 27 || generated in disclosures or responses to discovery in this matter. 28 So PAGE STIPULATED PROTECTIVE ORDER □□□□□□□□□□□□□□□□□□□□□□□□

1 2.8 Expert: A person with specialized knowledge or experience in a matter 2 || pertinent to the litigation who has been retained by a Party or its counsel to serve as 3 || an expert witness or as a consultant in this Action. This definition includes a 4 || professional jury or trial consultant retained in connection with this litigation. 5 2.9 House Counsel: Attorneys who are employees for a Party. House 6 || Counsel does not include Outside Counsel of Record or any other outside counsel. 7 2.10 Non-Party: Any natural person, partnership, corporation, association, or 8 || other legal entity not named as a Party to this action. 9 2.11 Outside Counsel of Record: Attorneys who are not employees of a party 10 || to this Action but are retained to represent or advise a party to this Action and have 11 || appeared in this Action on behalf of that party or are affiliated with a law firm that 12 || has appeared on behalf of that party, including support staff. 13 2.12 Party: Any party to this Action, including its officers, directors, 14 || employees, consultants, retatned experts, House Counsel, and Outside Counsel of 15 || Record (and their support staffs). 16 2.13 Producing Party: A Party or Non-Party that produces Disclosure or 17 || Discovery Material in this Action. 18 2.14 Professional Vendors: Persons or entities that provide litigation support 19 || services (e.g., photocopying, videotaping, translating, preparing exhibits or 20 || demonstrations, and organizing, storing, or retrieving data in any form or medium) 21 || and their employees and subcontractors. 22 2.15 Protected Material: Any Disclosure or Discovery Material that is 23 || designated as “CONFIDENTIAL.” 24 2.16 Receiving Party: A Party that receives Disclosure or Discovery Material 25 || from a Producing Party. 263. SCOPE 27 The protections conferred by this Order cover not only Protected Material (as 28 || defined above), but also (1) any information copied or extracted from Protected oo PAGE3— STIPULATED PROTECTIVE ORDER □□□□□□□□□□□□□□□□□□□□□□□□□

1 || Material; (2) all copies, excerpts, summaries, or compilations of Protected Material; 2 || and (3) any testimony, conversations, or presentations by Parties or their Counsel or 3 || their Experts that might reveal Protected Material.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Bahrikyan v. Transamerica Life Ins. Co., (E.D. Cal. 2022).

Bahrikyan v. Transamerica Life Ins. Co. (Bahrikyan v. Transamerica Life Ins. Co.) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Boakai v. Gonzales
447 F.3d 1 (First Circuit, 2006)
Kamakana v. City and County of Honolulu
447 F.3d 1172 (Ninth Circuit, 2006)
Center for Auto Safety v. Chrysler Group, LLC
809 F.3d 1092 (Ninth Circuit, 2016)