Bahr v. Seager
228 A.D. 644
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York·Decided December 15, 1929·Published
Opinion
Order reversed upon, the law, with ten dollars costs and disbursements, and motion denied, with ten dollars costs. Examinations before trial in this class of cases are rarely necessary and should be granted only when it is shown that the evidence sought to be adduced at the examination is material and necessary upon the trial. (Stogner v. Albright, 219 App. Div. 748; Wessel v. Schwarzler, No. 1,144 id. 587.) Lazansky, P. J., Rich, Young, Seeger and Scudder, JJ., concur.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Bahr v. Seager, 228 A.D. 644 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1929).
228 A.D. 644 (Bahr v. Seager) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.
Related
Stogner v. Albright
219 A.D. 748 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 1927)