Bahr v. O'Nate
This text of 4 F. Supp. 776 (Bahr v. O'Nate) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering District Court, N.D. California primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
This patent (U. S. No. 1,582,500) infringement suit is of trifling importance. But in one respect it is unique if not a scintillating gem.
For the evidence was presented and the cause argued all in less than 30 minutes. The evidence is scanty, though like Mereutio’s wound, “twill serve,” disclosing that in 1925 O’Nate made at least one appliance like that patented.
No question is made of equitable jurisdiction or validity of the patent. Accordingly, the court finds for plaintiff, who may have a reference for an accounting, if deemed worth while.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
4 F. Supp. 776, 1928 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 1818, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/bahr-v-onate-cand-1928.