Bahou v. Prism Technologies Group, Inc.
This text of Bahou v. Prism Technologies Group, Inc. (Bahou v. Prism Technologies Group, Inc.) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering District Court, D. Nebraska primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT DISTRICT OF NEBRASKA OMAHA DIVISION
ANDRE J. BAHOU, § § PLAINTIFF § § v. § CASE NO. 8:17-CV-00462 § PRISM TECHNOLOGIES GROUP, INC., § PRISM TECHNOLOGIES LLC, § GREGORY J. DUMAN, L. ERIC LOEWE, § STEVEN J. YASUDA, AND § HUSSEIN A. ENAN, § § DEFENDANTS §
AGREED ORDER OF DISMISSAL
The parties submitted to this Court a Joint Motion to Dismiss [Doc. 129] in which they advised the Court that they have settled all claims and controversies at issue and asked this Court to dismiss this suit with prejudice, while retaining jurisdiction to enforce the terms of the parties’ settlement agreement pursuant to Kokkonen v. Guardian Life Insurance Co. of America, 511 U.S. 375, 381-82 (1994) and Gilbert v. Monsanto Co., 216 F.3d 695, 699 (8th Cir. 2000). The Court grants the parties’ joint motion; accordingly, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED THAT: 1. The parties shall comply with the terms of their settlement agreement entered into on or about July 16, 2019;
2. By consent of the parties, the Court shall retain jurisdiction for the purpose of enforcing the terms of the settlement agreement.
Except as provided for in paragraphs 1 and 2, above, this case is dismissed, with prejudice, and each party shall bear its own attorney fees and costs. Signed this 31st day of July, 2019.
s/ Joseph F. Bataillon Senior United States District Judge
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
Bahou v. Prism Technologies Group, Inc., Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/bahou-v-prism-technologies-group-inc-ned-2019.