Bahnsen v. Chesebro
77 N.C. 325
This text of 77 N.C. 325 (Bahnsen v. Chesebro) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of North Carolina primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Bluebook
Bahnsen v. Chesebro, 77 N.C. 325 (N.C. 1877).
Opinion
Upon reading the affidavits filed in the complaint, we are satisfied that there was probable cause to support the allegation that the contract was obtained by means of false and fraudulent representations. We concur with His Honor in the conclusion that the motion to vacate the order of arrest ought not to be granted.
No error.
PER Curiam. Judgment affirmed.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
Bluebook (online)
77 N.C. 325, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/bahnsen-v-chesebro-nc-1877.