Bahner v. Stone Valley M. F. Ins.
This text of 17 A. 983 (Bahner v. Stone Valley M. F. Ins.) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of Pennsylvania primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
An examination of this record fails to convince us that the learned judge below committed any error in entering a compulsory nonsuit. The evidence shows that the plaintiff was insured in excess of two thirds of the cash value of the property. This was in direct violation of that clause or condition of defendant’s policy which provides “that the aggregate amount insured in this and all other companies, on the above mentioned property, shall not exceed two thirds of the cash value.” Under such circumstances there was nothing to submit to the jury.
Judgment affirmed.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
17 A. 983, 127 Pa. 464, 1889 Pa. LEXIS 1139, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/bahner-v-stone-valley-m-f-ins-pa-1889.