Bahl v. City of New York

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York

Bahl v. City of New York

60 A.D.3d 584, 874 N.Y.S.2d 908

CourtAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

DecidedMarch 31, 2009

StatusPublished

This text of 60 A.D.3d 584 (Bahl v. City of New York) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Bahl v. City of New York, 60 A.D.3d 584, 874 N.Y.S.2d 908 (N.Y. Ct. App. 2009).

Pincite

Opinion

— Order, Supreme Court, Bronx County (Edgar G. Walker, J.), entered December 21, 2007, which, in an action for personal injuires sustained in a slip and fall on snow and ice in a parking lot owned by defendant City and used by third-party defendant pursuant to a city permit, inter alia, denied third-party defendant’s motion for summary judgment dismissing the complaint and denied plaintiffs cross motion for summary judgment, unanimously affirmed, without costs.

[585]*585Issues of fact exist, including whether there was a reasonable amount of time after cessation of the storm and before plaintiffs accident to clear the lot of snow and ice (see Valentine v City of New York, 86 AD2d 381, 383 [1982], affd 57 NY2d 932 [1982]; Bowen v City Univ. of N.Y., 294 AD2d 322 [2002]). We have considered the parties’ other arguments and find them unavailing. Concur—Gonzalez, P.J., Tom, Sweeny, Catterson and Renwick, JJ.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

— Order, Supreme Court, Bronx County (Edgar G. Walker, J.), entered December 21, 2007, which, in an action for personal injuires sustained in a slip and fall on snow and ice in a parking lot owned by defendant City and used by third-party defendant pursuant to a city permit, inter alia, denied third-party defendant’s motion for summary judgment dismissing the complaint and denied plaintiffs cross motion for summary judgment, unanimously affirmed, without costs.

[585]*585Issues of fact exist, including whether there was a reasonable amount of time after cessation of the storm and before plaintiffs accident to clear the lot of snow and ice (see Valentine v City of New York, 86 AD2d 381, 383 [1982], affd 57 NY2d 932 [1982]; Bowen v City Univ. of N.Y., 294 AD2d 322 [2002]). We have considered the parties’ other arguments and find them unavailing. Concur—Gonzalez, P.J., Tom, Sweeny, Catterson and Renwick, JJ.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

60 A.D.3d 584, 874 N.Y.S.2d 908, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/bahl-v-city-of-new-york-nyappdiv-2009.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack